Abstract The clinical-genetic characteristics of ETV6-RUNX1-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still unclear in pediatrics. Therefore, we conducted Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH), Polymerase Chain Reaction(PCR) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS) on 2171 B-lineage ALL cases and identified 49 (2.3%) ETV6-RUNX1-like and 406 (18.7%) ETV6-RUNX1 cases. We found that: i) ETV6-RUNX1-like patients were characterized by ETV6 abnormalities and enrich for PAX5, KRAS, CDKN2A/2B, CRLF2, IKZF1, PTTN11, NRAS, FLT3. ii) Genes affecting of transcription factor regulation, RAS signal pathway, cell cycle regulation, JAK/STAT signal pathway and epigenetic modification were significantly frequent in ETV6-RUNX1-like ALL. iii) Four hub genes, ETV6, CDKN2A, ABL1 and MYC, were identified among ETV6-RUNX1-like ALL. The clinical characteristics highlighted that: i) ETV6-RUNX1-like patients had higher minimal residual disease (MRD) persistence at day 15 (D15 MRD) than ETV6-RUNX1 patients (P = 0.023). ii) 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of ETV6-RUNX1-like patients were both significantly worse than ETV6-RUNX1 patients (65.8 ± 15.4% vs. 95.7 ± 1.0%, P < 0.001 and 91.3 ± 4.2% vs 98.2 ± 0.7%, P = 0.006). iii) ETV6-RUNX1-like positive was the risk factor for EFS (HR 3.25 (95% CI, 1.23–8.61); P = 0.018). Therefore, it is important to discern ETV6-RUNX1-like patients early and opt for more intensive chemotherapy for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: