Introduction: There are insufficient scalable, evidence-based treatments to meet the increasing mental health needs of young persons in Singapore. Offering interim, brief interventions for distressed treatment-seekers can improve care access and mitigate adverse effects of long waiting times. This study proposes to test the efficacy of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), a strengths-based, goal-directed intervention, for psychological distress in help-seeking adolescents and young adults. Methods: We will conduct a fully-powered, randomised, single-centre, two-armed, parallel, superiority, controlled trial. From September 2023 to March 2025, the study will recruit 124 participants (ages 16-30) presenting at a national youth mental health service in Singapore (CHAT, Centre of Excellence for Youth Mental Health) with clinically-assessed non-specific psychological distress, subthreshold or prodromal symptoms, or a first episode of a mood disorder. Participants will be excluded if they have high suicidal risk, psychosis, cognitive impairments, or current psychological treatments. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive six-session, case manager-delivered SFBT or treatment as usual (TAU), case management. Participants receiving SFBT are hypothesized to have greater improvements in self-reported psychological distress, from baseline to eight weeks, compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes are self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms, and functional impairment. The study will additionally explore if SFBT is associated with: 1) increased self-efficacy and decreased hopelessness; 2) decreased downstream referrals at post-intervention; and 3) sustained clinical gains at three months post-intervention, compared to TAU. Significance: Results have implications for expanding capacity of mental health services and enhancing capabilities of frontline case managers to provide timely and low-intensity evidence-based interventions to improve the mental health of young persons in Singapore.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: