Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the context of anthropogenic global warming, the West-Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) is expected to be the greatest contributor to sea-level rise in the coming centuries, thus posing a significant threat for high population densities in coastal regions. Equilibrium simulations of regional warming have shown that the WAIS can tip to a largely collapsed state at forcing levels that will be reached even for relatively low emission paths (SSP2), a process that can be mathematically understood as crossing a bifurcation. It has been shown that some systems might undergo tipping before reaching their bifurcation point due to large rates of the forcing. This process is known as rate-induced tipping (R-tipping) and typically involves competing timescales between negative and positive feedbacks. In the case of the WAIS, the main positive feedback is known as the marine ice-sheet instability, which consists in an increase of the outflow of ice at the grounding line as it retreats on a retrograde bedrock, possibly giving rise to a runaway process. In some cases, such a retreat can however be stabilised by the land uplift and the local drop in sea-surface height following an ice thinning. This process is commonly called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and presents an important negative feedback on marine-terminating ice sheets. Due to a regional anomaly of low viscosities of the upper mantle, the GIA timescale in West-Antarctica has been proven to be one of the shortest observed globally, which could prevent the occurrence of R-tipping. The upper-mantle viscosity of West-Antarctica is however subject to large uncertainties due to the sparsity of seismic data available. To assess how the upper-mantle viscosity can condition the occurrence of R-tipping of the WAIS, we present coupled ice-sheet/solid-Earth simulations that sample the range of plausible viscosity fields under various rates of climatic forcing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montoya et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: