Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fragility analysis is essential for assessing structural vulnerability during natural hazards like earthquakes and floods. It guides risk mitigation, enhances infrastructure resilience, and informs decision-making, emergency planning, and disaster recovery efforts. This manuscript aims to explore the fragility curves potential in assessing the structural systems performance, particularly those with high irregularity. The study employs a non-linear static analysis of a G+6 storey irregular structural frame designed in accordance with Indian standards using SAP2000. It demonstrates the use of fragility curves in assessing structural performance of a G+6 irregular reinforced concrete structure under earthquake forces. This manuscript underscores the importance of considering discrete damage probabilities and collapse risks in different directions for accurately assessing structural vulnerabilities. It reveals a higher collapse probability within the direction of push-y (44%) in contrast with the push x-direction (5%), indicating a greater susceptibility to damage under specific loading conditions. The study concludes that fragility curves offer a rational and consistent method for seismic performance assessment of structures with high irregularity. It also affirms the adequacy of buildings designed as per Indian standards in withstanding earthquake forces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mokashi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: