This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Sulfate resistance is evaluated in mortars containing sulfate-resistant cementitious materials (SRCMs) developed by mixing ground granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, silica fume and desulfurisation gypsum. Compressive strength testing, X-ray diffraction analysis, differential thermal analysis and mercury intrusion porosimetry are carried out. Results show that the sulfate resistance of mortars mixed with SRCMs at a replacement percentage of 74 wt% is superior to that of mortars with 30 wt% fly ash when exposed to drying–wetting cycles in sodium sulfate solution, because adding SRCMs decreases the calcium hydroxide content, causing a reduction in gypsum formation. Moreover, reducing the water-to-binder ratio (W/B) from 0.50 to 0.35 increases the loss of compressive strength ratio (L f ) of mortars with SRCMs immersed in ammonium–magnesium sulfate complex solution. Specifically, the L f values of mortars with W/B of 0.50 and 0.35 are 42.7% and 36.0% after 100 days of immersion, respectively. Furthermore, the main component of samples subjected to complex solution is identified as gypsum. In addition, both L f and porosity exhibit a strong linear positive correlation with W/B. Finally, the findings confirm that optimising the composition of cementitious materials and lowering W/B could improve the sulfate resistance of concretes used for a sulfate-rich sewage environment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: