Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The temperature structure of a giant planet was traditionally thought to be an adiabat because convective mixing homogenizes entropy. The only in-situ measurement made by the Galileo Probe detected a near-adiabatic temperature structure within one of Jupiter’s 5 hot spots with small but definite local departures from adiabaticity. We analyze Juno’s microwave observations near Jupiter’s equator (0 ~ 5 oN) and find that the equatorial temperature structure is best characterized by a stable super-adiabatic temperature profile rather than an adiabatic one. Water is the only substance with sufficient abundance to alter the atmosphere's mean molecular weight and prevent dynamic instability if a super-adiabatic temperature gradient exists. Thus, from the super-adiabaticity, our results indicate a water concentration (or the oxygen to hydrogen ratio) of about 4 times solar with a possible range of 2 ~ 7 times solar in Jupiter’s equatorial region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: