Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Satellites in Earth orbit are exposed to Earth radiation, consisting of reflected solar and emitted thermal radiation, thereby exerting a radiation pressure force that causes acceleration and affects the orbits. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On (GRACE-FO) mission aiming to retrieve the Earth gravity potential is critically dependent on accounting for all non-gravitational forces, including the Earth radiation. Although weather-of-the-day; e.g., clouds and their properties, has a major role in Earth radiation pressure, only climatology has been used so far to represent this force. Using climatological data doesn’t account for orbit perturbations owing to weather-related transient changes in the Earth radiation pressure. We show here that the top-of-atmosphere radiation fluxes computed with a numerical weather prediction model explain most of the measured variations in the radial acceleration of the GRACE-FO satellite. Our physics-based modelling corrects a hitherto unexplained lack of power spectral density in the measured accelerations. For example, we can accurately model the accelerations associated with a tropical storm in Indian Ocean in December 2020, which would not be possible when using climatological data. Our results demonstrate that using a global numerical weather prediction model significantly improves the simulation of non-gravitational effects in the satellites’ orbit. This advancement will allow more precise gravity retrieval and its applications in Earth sciences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motlaghzadeh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: