The chiral properties of carbon nanotubes provide them with unique optoelectronic capabilities, making them highly sought-after one-dimensional nanoscale structures. CNTFETs can achieve outstanding ballistic transport at lower temperatures. Devices similar to MOSFETs would undeniably benefit from CNT's optoelectronic and low scattering characteristics. This investigation presents a highly efficient CNT transistor modeling technique. The approach employs the cubic spline estimation to analyze the impact of oxide thickness and dielectric material on the electric conduction of a nanoscale regime Schottky barrier CNTFET under ballistic consequences. By varying the dielectric constant of the insulator from a range of 3.9 to 30 while keeping the temperature at 100k and the gate voltage (V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</inf> ) at 0.4 V, the drain current (I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> ) of a carbon nanotube (CNT) with a diameter of 1 nm increases by approximately 5 times when the drain voltage (V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> ) is set to 0.6 V. Similarly, when the gate voltage (V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</inf> ) is increased to 0.65 V, the drain current (I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> ) increases by approximately 4 times, and when the gate voltage (V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</inf> ) is further increased to 0.9 V, the drain current (I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> ) increases by approximately 3 times. The effect of tube diameter of CNT, oxide thickness, and DOS function is also evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: