Atmospheric icing ensues when water droplets in the atmosphere freeze upon interacting with diverse objects, presenting substantial hazards to infrastructure and leading to disruptions in both road and air traffic. This study introduces a detailed analysis of in-cloud icing conducted specifically over Fagernesfjellet, Norway. Utilizing the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, ERA-5 data was employed for both initial and lateral boundary conditions. The simulation covers a three-month period from October 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, with a grid spacing of 9,3,1 km. Acknowledging the substantial influence of local terrain on icing conditions, the analysis prioritizes the highest model resolution. The determination of the icing load involves the utilization of a Makkonen ice accretion model, and the resultant values, alongside surface parameters, undergo validation against field measurements taken at Fagernesfjellet, Norway. The representation of supercooled liquid water (SLW) in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models is crucial for precise atmospheric icing forecasts. Hence, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the Thompson scheme's performance in simulating liquid water content (LWC) and, consequently, the icing load, along with general weather parameters associated with icing. From our preliminary analysis, the WRF model showcases effectiveness in simulating in-cloud icing conditions. WRF adeptly reproduces crucial surface parameters such as temperature, pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, and direction. Nevertheless, there are discernible differences between the observed data and WRF results, particularly noticeable in the case of wind speed and direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Punde et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: