A major discovery in the last 5 years has been the recognition that the geomagnetic field was at ultralow field strengths, some ten times weaker than the present-day, during the Ediacaran Period. These ultralow values were first reported from single crystal paleointensity analyses of 565 Ma rocks of the Sept Îles Mafic Intrusion Suite (Bono et al., Nature Geosci., 2019), and were later confirmed by studies of dikes and lavas from other sites in Ukraine and Canada (e.g., Thallner et al., EPSL, 2021). The ultralow values are followed by a rapid increase in field strength in the early Cambrian (Zhou et al., Nature Commun., 2022) and together these signals are consistent with initial nucleation of Earth’s inner core, as predicted by thermal models and geodynamo simulations (Davies et al., GJI, 2022). An updated timeline incorporating new paleointensity data from several localities in North America, South America and Africa highlights a striking temporal correspondence between the ultralow field, the Ediacaran diversification of macroscopic animals, and some geochemical indicators for the rise of oxygenation. The onset of inner core growth and unusual state of the geomagnetic field should not correspond with animal evolution or oxygenation unless changes in the Ediacaran magnetosphere attendant with the ultralow field somehow affected the atmosphere, oceans and/or biosphere. We will consider these possibilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cottrell et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: