Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The socioeconomic impacts of compound extremes are sudden, severe, and multidimensional. Without precautionary measures, social and economic safety nets including community support and insurance, the negative effects of a single, short-run shock on households can extend to the long-run and persist over many years. Studies on the impacts of compound extremes have focused on objective measurements of well-being, including income, health, education; with much fewer studies on subjective well-being. Looking into subjective well-being takes an evaluative perspective on the quality of life, wherein the recovery from a disaster takes more than just the return to employment, for instance. Previous studies have shown that subjective well-being is also a good predictor of life expectancy, productivity, educational performance, and voting behaviour. Using econometric methods on sub-national, household panel data from the EU Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) and a composite index for the simultaneous occurrence of droughts and heatwaves, I quantify and compare the impacts of compound dry-and-hot events (CDHE) in Europe on objective and subjective measurements of well-being. The results of this study provide new information on the magnitude, as well as, the persistence of effects from CDHE, based on both the traditional income-based measurements versus the self-reported measurements of well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jessie Ruth Schleypen (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: