Climate model simulations reveal short-lived chlorocarbons add 120 ppt of stratospheric chlorine via the Asian summer monsoon, indicating minor global ozone loss despite notable polar shifts.
Stratospheric ozone is catalytically destroyed by chlorine released from ozone-depleting substances (ODS), e.g., chlorofluorocarbons, and halogenated very-short-lived substances (VSLS). In addition to chlorine contributions from continued emissions of Montreal Protocol-regulated long-lived ODSs (from existing banks, production, consumption, and feedstocks), recent research has highlighted concern over rapidly growing emissions of dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) - a chlorinated VSLS (Cl-VSLS). Large emissions come from Asia have developed because of fast economic growth. In this study, we have conducted model simulations with geographically resolved surface emissions of the two most abundant Cl-VSLS, CH2Cl2 and CHCl3, with the NASA GEOS Chemistry Climate Model (GEOSCCM). The simulations cover the 2011-2022 period to understand the transport pathway of Asian Cl-VSLS emissions to the stratosphere and to quantify the contribution of Asian emissions to the stratospheric chlorine budget w.r.t. the global estimate during the 2010s. With global emissions of about 1300 Gg/yr in 2020-2022, our results suggest Cl-VSLS adds about 120 ppt Cl to stratospheric chlorine. The Asian Summer Monsoon plays a dominant role in the troposphere-to-stratosphere transport of Cl-VSLS and is twice as efficient for delivering CH2Cl2 to the stratosphere than the tropics. About 200 ppt of VSLS-Cl gets into the stratosphere during summer 2022 within Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone. GEOSCCM simulation results suggest that the overall impact of Cl-VSLS on stratospheric ozone is < 2 DU (0.7%) globally. Interestingly, 2019 features an anomalously large ozone perturbation due to Cl-VSLS. While global ozone changes little, total column ozone decreases by 10 DU in the Antarctic but increases by 15 DU in the Arctic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: