Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The response of global dryness and vegetation to CO2 removal experiments, especially for net- negative emission is immature. Here we conducted a thorough investigation to identify hysteresis and reversibility in global dryness, as well as the vegetation productivity’s response to dry and wet episodes, considering their asymmetrical nature. The asymmetry index (AI) includes two important aspects such as positive AI indicates a dominant increase of vegetation productivity during wet episodes compared to the decline in dry episodes and negative AI implies a larger reduction of productivity in dry years compared to an increase in wet years. Aggregate results from various drought indices and vegetation productivity reveal a dominant dryness in the CO2 decrease phase. Global dryness shows strong hysteresis and irreversible behavior over half of the global land with significant regional disparity. Irreversible changes in dryness are concentrated in specific areas, i.e., hotspots, covering over 14% of the global land, particularly pronounced in Northern Africa, Southwest Russia, and Central America. Moreover, a wider spread of negative asymmetry indicates a significant decrease in vegetation productivity caused by dryness. Importantly, the potential evapotranspiration is projected to be the primary driver of global dryness as well as vegetation asymmetry. Our findings suggest only CO2 alleviation is not enough to cope with drought rather implementing advanced water management strategies is a must to mitigate the impact of drought effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: