This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are key regulators of soil C and N cycling, soil erosion, and water (re)distribution in drylands. Nevertheless, huge knowledge gaps exist about one core aspect of biocrust ecology, namely how these processes are affected by biocrust-eating macro-arthropods. We addressed this knowledge gap by exposing biocrusts to varying levels of isopod crustivory (i.e. grazing intensity), and quantifying the consequences for CO2 efflux, C fixation and microtopography. Biocrust CO2 efflux decreased with increasing crustivory and recovered after several wetting events. Crustivory had a negative effect on biocrust C fixation, but only after the CO2 efflux recovered to pre-crustivory levels. Biocrust surface roughness increased with increasing crustivory to a peak and then began to decrease, implying that varying levels of crustivory may have opposing consequences for water infiltration and runoff generation. Our findings suggest that macro-crustivores may play a key role in regulating biocrust ecological functioning, introducing a whole new line of crustivory research that will be instrumental in conceptualizing various ecosystem dynamics in drylands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: