Assessments that can measure student understanding of concepts in a reliable and valid way are incredibly valuable in research. Unfortunately, assessments can be a source of bias, differentially impacting students along various demographic lines. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is a method to explore assessment bias. However, DIF is primarily limited to a single binary demographic variable (e.g. white and non-white; male and female). In this paper, we describe a novel expansion of DIF methods to explore intersections of student identities. We demonstrate the use of classic DIF on a data set of 255 complete responses to a CS1 assessment using binary race and gender variables in our analyses. Then, we present the importance of intersectional DIF by running a similar analysis on intersectional data. Using these methods, we identify problematic items on the assessment that are biased against certain groups of test-takers. Our work contributes an innovative method to help interpret assessment results and inform changes to assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: