Abstract Bibliometric analysis stands as a valuable means of assessing the impact and significance of scientific journals. This study delves into a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Tropical Forest Science, utilizing data from the Scopus database within the timeframe of 2001 to 2023. Over a three-month period (August – October 2023), we employed the R software and the "bibliometrix" package to scrutinize publication trends, authorship patterns, citation trends, and collaboration networks within the journal's literature. Our analysis yielded noteworthy findings, such as the presence of 33 single-authored articles, indicating a substantial number of single-authored contributions. The year 2012 demonstrated the highest average citations per year, underscoring its impact in the scholarly community. Additionally, the United States claimed the top position in production over time, reaching 267 documents in 2023. Regarding research topics, "priority journal" held the highest frequency in 2007, suggesting its significance in the journal's literature. The globally most cited document was "Science" authored by Bonan GB in 2008, amassing a remarkable 3,981 citations. The United States emerged as the most often cited country overall, with a sum of 17,034 citations. In essence, this bibliometric analysis furnishes researchers and stakeholders with a comprehensive grasp of the impact and influence of the Journal of Tropical Forest Science, serving as a valuable resource for guiding future research endeavors and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations in this significant field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gokul et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: