Abstract Water temperature is a key abiotic factor routinely measured in ponds and lakes. Here we investigate potential inaccuracies in water temperature measurements caused by the heating of loggers by direct solar radiation. We conducted a comparative analysis between surface temperature measurements obtained from deploying three different logger types in a small pond and a large lake. For temperature loggers with sensing element inside the housing, our results show temperature differences up to 0.8°C between shielded and non-shielded loggers in the small pond. This temperature excess of the non-shielded logger correlates with solar radiation measurements, suggesting that indeed direct solar radiation is the main source of uncertainty for non-shielded loggers at the water surface. In contrast, a more accurate logger with sensing element outside the logger housing was found to remain comparably insensitive to direct solar radiation with temperature difference never exceeding 0.3°C even in the small pond. Finally, measurement differences were always below 0.25°C for all types of loggers in the near-shore of a large lake. We show that using non-shielded temperature loggers to calculate surface heat fluxes may overestimate total heat flux by up to a few tens of Wm⁻ ² on sunny days. Averaged over longer periods, the overestimation caused by using non-shielded loggers can lead to a bias of a few Wm⁻ ². In conclusion, we suggest that cheap but widely used temperature loggers with internal sensing element should be protected from direct sunlight when used in still water bodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bärenbold et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: