March 4, 2024Open Access

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study (Preprint)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

KBKeely BarnesUniversity of Ottawa HSHeidi SveistrupBruyère MBMark BayleyUniversity Health Network

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Method-comparison study protocol reports the validation of a virtual concussion toolkit in injured workers, highlighting the need for remote clinical reliability.

Key Points

This protocol aims to document the psychometric properties of a virtual concussion toolkit, assessing its diagnostic sensitivity against in-person care.
Method-comparison protocol evaluates 39 injured workers using vestibular ocular motor screening, comparing remote video observations against direct care.
Highlights potential remote care pathways for mild traumatic brain injuries, while establishing interrater reliability metrics with final results pending.

Cite This Study

Barnes et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75c9bb6db6435876d38b3 https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.57663

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Method-comparison study protocol reports the validation of a virtual concussion toolkit in injured workers, highlighting the need for remote clinical reliability.

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study (Preprint)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study (Preprint)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider