PurposeSingle-energy computed tomography (CT) often suffers from poor contrast yet remains critical for effective radiotherapy treatment. Modern therapy systems are often equipped with both megavoltage (MV) and kilovoltage (kV) X-ray sources and thus already possess hardware for dual-energy (DE) CT. There is unexplored potential for enhanced image contrast using MV-kV DE-CT in radiotherapy contexts.ApproachA single-line integral toy model was designed for computing basis material signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) using estimation theory. Five dose-matched spectra (3 kV, 2 MV) and three variables were considered: spectral combination, spectral dose allocation, and object material composition. The single-line model was extended to a simulated CT acquisition of an anthropomorphic phantom with and without a metal implant. Basis material sinograms were computed and synthesized into virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs). MV-kV and kV-kV VMIs were compared with single-energy images.ResultsThe 80 kV-140 kV pair typically yielded the best SNRs, but for bone thicknesses >8 cm, the detunedMV-80 kV pair surpassed it. Peak MV-kV SNR was achieved with ∼90% dose allocated to the MV spectrum. In CT simulations of the pelvis with a steel implant, MV-kV VMIs yielded a higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) than single-energy CT and kV-kV DE-CT. Without steel, the MV-kV VMIs produced higher contrast but lower CNR than single-energy CT.ConclusionsThis work analyzes MV-kV DE-CT imaging and assesses its potential advantages. The technique may be used for metal artifact correction and generation of VMIs with higher native contrast than single-energy CT. Improved denoising is generally necessary for greater CNR without metal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jadick et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: