Qualitative analysis demonstrates everyday mobility patterns among skilled U.S. migrants, indicating how capital and policy shape local social inclusion.
Everyday mobility is critical to understand migrants' accessibility and inclusions to the destination cities. Existing research was insufficient to explain the everyday movement of relatively privileged skilled migrants from the Global North to the Global South, nor did it distinguish the role of one's capability and intentionality in shaping mobility. To fill in the research gap, we employ the capital-mobility framework to investigate how skilled U.S. migrants' capital accumulation and intentionality jointly affect their everyday mobility in Chinese cities, and the implications for their social inclusion in the local society. We use sketch mapping with semistructured interviews to conduct this study in the Pearl River Delta region, a pioneer of economic development in China. We find that although migrants' capital accumulation facilitated their everyday movement, COVID-19 disrupted such mobility. Whether migrants had intentions to move varied, shaped by geopolitical relations, urban environment, and migrants' own capital. The voluntary or involuntary nature of their everyday mobility also suggests whether their social inclusion or exclusion in the local society is by choice or constraint. Our study integrates geographic information systems visualization with qualitative data to highlight the spatial mobility and immobility at the individual level and generates policy implications for retaining global talent at the city level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: