Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A major open problem in proof complexity is to show that random 3-CNFs with linear number of clauses require super-polynomial size refutations in bounded depth Frege. We make a first step towards this question by showing a super-linear lower bound: for every k, there exists ε > 0 such that any depth-k Frege refutation of a random n-variable 3-CNF with Θ(n) clauses has Ω(n1 + ε) steps w.h.p. Our proof involves a novel adaptation of the deterministic restriction technique of Chaudhuri and Radhakrishnan (STOC'96).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gryaznov et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: