The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) define science literacy as having the knowledge and understanding of scientific concepts and processes and the ability to question natural world phenomena (National Research Council Citation2012). When students engage with texts that deal with real world issues, they can look for claims supported by evidence and work with reasoning of other students through interactive conversations about the data and sharing of ideas. Therefore, integrating scientific arguments into the classroom is an important step in developing scientific literacy as it helps students engage in authentic learning through a variety of practices and methods to construct and evaluate claims and evidence. In our teaching and professional learning programs, we address the question of how to meaningfully assess students' science literacy and ability to engage in science argumentation through a CER framework that incorporates the Next Generation Science Standards. The answer to our inquiry was the development of Scenario-based Assessments (SBA). This article explains the elements of an SBA and presents a template and example of SBAs that could be used in middle and high school STEM classrooms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kareem et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: