A comprehensive review of recent process developments in the field of post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from power plant flue gases is presented in this article. Different types of technologies for post-combustion CO2 capture namely: Absorption, Membrane, and Adsorption (AMA), were evaluated based on their CO2 recovery, energy efficiency, and cost. The study examines the fundamentals of each process, including their advantages and limitations, and highlights the recent advancements made in these areas. Specifically, the paper provides an overview of developments in each process area and discusses the development of new process configurations and the optimisation of existing ones with a view to identify the optimal process route. The two-stage-hybrid configurations were identified as the optimal process configurations that will meet the required needs in terms of energy efficiency, cost savings, and the desired CO2 purity and recovery of ≥95mol% and ≥97mol% respectively. However, techno-economic analyses are still needed to identify the best configuration. Thus the review concludes by emphasising the need for further research and development on techno-economic analyses to identify the best configuration in the two-stage-hybrid options for post-combustion carbon capture technology to be viable for commercialisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: