Benchmark evaluation demonstrates a 3.8-fold speedup over graphics processing units on vectorized dataflow accelerators, highlighting the viability of general dataflow threading.
Spatial dataflow architectures such as reconfigurable dataflow accelerators (RDA) can provide much higher performance and efficiency than CPUs and GPUs. In particular, vectorized reconfigurable dataflow accelerators (vRDA) in recent literature represent a design point that enhances the efficiency of dataflow architectures with vectorization. Today, vRDAs can be exploited using either hard-coded kernels or MapReduce languages like Spatial, which cannot vectorize data-dependent control flow. In contrast, CPUs and GPUs can be programmed using general-purpose threaded abstractions. The ideal combination would be the generality of a threaded programming model coupled with the efficient execution model of a vRDA. We introduce Revet: a programming model, compiler, and execution model that lets threaded applications run efficiently on vRDAs. The Revet programming language uses threads to support a broader range of applications than prior parallel-patterns approaches, and our MLIR-based compiler lowers this language to a generic dataflow backend that operates on streaming tensors. Finally, we show that mapping threads to dataflow out-performs GPUs, the current state-of-the-art for threaded accelerators, by 3.8×.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rucker et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: