background: Accurate diagnosis, early detection, and differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma from mesothelioma; particularly the epithelioid subtype is needed to allow better management thus to improve their prognosis.Aim of our study was to assess applicability of CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 expression by immunohistochemistry to differentiate between lung adenocarcinoma and epithelioid mesothelioma in addition to detection of their prognostic roles and relation to patients' survival.Methods: We collected samples from 30 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and 30 patients diagnosed with epithelioid mesothelioma. For the immunohistochemistry, sections of all collected samples were incubated with CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 to assess their diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A highly significant association was detected between positive CPA4, UHRF1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma and their diagnostic accuracy (p value <0.001). Also, highly significant association was detected between positive CD90, Glypican 1 expression in epithelioid mesothelioma and their diagnostic accuracy (p value <0.001). CPA4 expression was associated with shorter OS rate (P value 0.019, 0.009) UHRF1 expression was associated with shorter OS rate (P value=0.009) Conclusions: CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 were considered novel biomarkers that have important roles in differentiation between epithelioid malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung with high sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelrahman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: