Key result
Rivaroxaban plus aspirin shows no benefit over clopidogrel plus aspirin for major amputation or CV death.
Why the study?
The optimal antithrombotic regimen following infrainguinal endovascular revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia remains unknown.
Does rivaroxaban plus aspirin improve hemodynamic and clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin in peripheral artery disease patients after infrainguinal endovascular revascularization?
RCT (n=53)
Computer-generated simple randomization
Does rivaroxaban plus aspirin improve hemodynamic and clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin in peripheral artery disease patients after infrainguinal endovascular revascularization?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 6.9%
p-value: p=1.000
Dual pathway therapy with rivaroxaban and aspirin provides comparable short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes without increased major bleeding compared to clopidogrel and aspirin in chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients after revascularization.
Early ABI advantage with DAPT is not sustained; confirms comparable short-term hemodynamic outcomes with DPT versus DAPT after PAD revascularization.
Background: The best antithrombotic regimen following infrainguinal endovascular revascularization remains unknown. This study compared rivaroxaban with aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 53 patients with Rutherford categories 4-6 who underwent technically and clinically successful infrainguinal endovascular revascularization. Computer-generated simple randomization allocated 24 patients to dual pathway therapy (DPT; rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily) and 29 patients to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; clopidogrel 75 mg once daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily). Both regimens were continued for 6 months. Patients were assessed at 1 : 6 months using the ankle-brachial index (ABI), Rutherford classification. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. At 1 month, the mean ABI was higher in the DAPT group than in the DPT group (0.99±0.07 vs. 0.92±0.09; p=0.005), whereas no significant between-group differences were observed at 3 or 6 months. Major amputation occurred in 1 patient (4.2%) in the DPT group and 2 patients (6.9%) in the DAPT group (p=1.000). One cardiovascular death occurred in the DAPT group, while none occurred in the DPT group (p=1.000). No major bleeding occurred in either group. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 2 patients (8.3%) in the DPT group and 1 patient (3.4%) in the DAPT group (p=0.866). Conclusion: Both regimens were associated with comparable short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and no major bleeding events. DPT showed numerically fewer major amputations and cardiovascular deaths, but the differences were not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (n=53). Rivaroxaban plus Aspirin (Dual Pathway Therapy) vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) was evaluated on Major amputation (p=1.000). Rivaroxaban plus aspirin resulted in similar rates of major amputation (4.2% vs 6.9%; p=1.000) and cardiovascular death compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin, with no major bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: