It is well known that the experience of a linearly accelerated observer with acceleration <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>a</a:mi></a:math>, interacting with a massless scalar field in its vacuum state in <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mn>3</c:mn><c:mo>+</c:mo><c:mn>1</c:mn></c:math> Minkowski spacetime, is identical to that of a static observer interacting with a massless scalar field in a thermal state of temperature <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mi>a</e:mi><e:mo>/</e:mo><e:mn>2</e:mn><e:mi>π</e:mi></e:mrow></e:math> in <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mn>3</g:mn><g:mo>+</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn></g:math> Minkowski spacetime. We study the robustness of this duality by comparing an observer undergoing circular motion in a thermal bath with an observer that undergoes circular motion around a linearly accelerated trajectory. We find that in most regimes, observers in these two cases experience the field in different ways, and are generally able to tell the difference between the two cases by measuring observables localized along their trajectories. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunney et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: