Case-control study finds higher dietary phytochemical index scores linked to lower benign prostatic hyperplasia risk in Iranian men, highlighting the protective role of plant-rich diets.
Background Dietary intake of phytochemicals has been associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases, but research on their relationship with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is limited. This case-control study aimed to investigate the association between a Dietary Phytochemical Index (DPI) and BPH risk in a Middle-Eastern population. Methods The study recruited 112 BPH patients and 112 age-matched healthy controls (40–75 years) from Al-Zahra Hospital Clinic in Isfahan, Iran between 2021 and 2022. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food-frequency questionnaire, and DPI was calculated as the ratio of energy intake from phytochemical-rich foods to total daily energy intake. Logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for potential confounders. Results In the crude model, participants in the highest DPI tertile had a 70% lower odds of BPH compared to those in the lowest tertile (OR:0.3, 95% CI 0.15–0.61, P-trend = 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, this inverse association remained significant (OR:0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.63, P-trend = 0.001). Participants with higher DPI consumed more whole grains ( p = 0.02), nuts ( p < 0.001), legumes ( p = 0.02), fruits ( p < 0.001), vegetables ( p < 0.001), olives and oilve products ( p = 0.02), and tomato and its products ( p < 0.001) in their diet compared to the lowest tertile. However, red meat ( p = 0.03) and refined grains ( p < 0.001) were consumed in higher amounts in the lowest tertile compared to the highest DPI tertile. Conclusions This study demonstrates a protective association between DPI and BPH risk in the Middle-Eastern population. Encouraging higher intake of phytochemical-rich foods may help reduce the risk of BPH, highlighting the relevance of nutritional science in promoting prostate health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mousavi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: