Introduction/Background The SENTIX was an international, multicentre, prospective single-arm study on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Here, we report the final survival outcomes of the study. Methodology Forty-seven sites across 18 countries participated in the study. Patients stages 1A1/LVSI+ - 1B2 (FIGO 2018), common histological types and no preoperatively suspicious lymph-nodes (LN) were prospectively enrolled between 05/2016–10/2020. All intention-to-treat (ITT) patients underwent bilateral SLN biopsy, followed by hysterectomy or trachelectomy. All harvested SLNs were completely processed by centrally controlled pathological ultrastaging. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063. Results A total of 594 ITT patients were enrolled, majority of which had squamous cell carcinoma (66.0%) and IB disease (IB1=46.8%; IB2=36.9%). Ultrastaging examination detected N1 SLN in 36 (6.1%) and isolated tumour cells in 20 (3.4%) patients. All N1 patients underwent adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 93.3% (95% CI: 94.9%; 91.6%), and overall survival (OS) 97.9% (95% CI: 98.9%; 97.0%). After a median follow-up of 47 months, 54 (9.1%) patients relapsed, out of which 20 (3.4%) died. The recurrence was pelvic, extra-pelvic, and combined in 28 (51.9%), 13 (24.1%), and 13 (24.1%) patients, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that DFS was related to tumour size (HR for >4 cm: 5.23), tumour grade 3 (HR: 4.24), and LVSI (HR: 2.65). No DFS benefit was found for open surgical approach (P = 0.39), and no negative impact of N1 SLN involvement (0.434) was observed. Conclusion The study showed that 2-year DFS and OS in patients after SLN biopsy is excellent and comparable to patients after PLND, reported in the recent prospective trials. In early-stage cervical cancer patients, SLN biopsy with pathological ultrastaging and no further lymphadenectomy is not associated with increased risk of recurrence. Disclosures Disclosures: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding This work was supported by Charles University in Prague (UNCE 204065 and PROGRES Q28/LF1) and by a grant from the Czech Health Research Council (NV19–03-00023). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cibula et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: