d sentences, a prevalent challenge in sentiment analysis. This approach groups sentences into positive or negative clusters and determines the sentiment of each cluster based on the majority of sentences within it, enhancing the overall accuracy of sentiment analysis. Another overlooked yet crucial aspect, the impact of negation and double negation on sentiment polarity, is also addressed. Current models often fail to capture these linguistic nuances, hindering a complete understanding of the true sentiment in the text. The research also introduces the FFBC algorithm, specifically designed to handle complex linguistic constructs like negations and double negations, often overlooked in current models. Validated on IMDb and Amazon Reviews Datasets, and tested on a unique Farmers' Protest Twitter dataset, the framework shows enhanced performance across key metrics compared to leading techniques like BERT, LSTMs, VADER, and SVM. This improvement underscores the potential of advanced sentiment analysis techniques in the digital era, offering significant insights into public sentiment during global events. The study concludes by highlighting the implications of this research for various stakeholders and outlining future research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yadav et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: