Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article (part one of two) surveys Dickens scholarship and adjacent work with a special emphasis on Dickens Quarterly. The author’s approach was inspired by the alternating micro- and macro- method of Robert Douglas-Fairhurst’s Turning Point 1851, and the personal approach of Annette Federico’s But For You, Dear Stranger (My Reading) and Nick Hornby’s Prince and Dickens: A Particular Kind of Genius. The article identifies these key trends: (1) A turn towards artists and scholars’ personal and autobiographical responses to Dickens’s work/life; (2) a reckoning with race and empire, especially how colonial enterprises are felt in London and in novels’ relationships; (3) places and spaces, including how buildings can communicate history or hold meaning; (4) charges of anti-Semitism and treatment of Jews; (5) intense, narrowly focused scholarship on topics like etymology, fungi, rot, historical happenings, both major (Crystal Palace) or minor (a Duke’s balloon trip).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rob Jacklosky (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: