Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although many epidemiologic studies focus on point identification, it is also possible to partially identify causal effects under consistency and the data alone. However, the literature on the so-called “assumption-free” bounds has focused on settings with time-fixed exposures. We describe assumption-free bounds for the effects of both static and dynamic sustained interventions. To provide intuition for the width of the bounds, we also discuss a mathematical connection between assumption-free bounds and clone-censor-weight approaches to causal effect estimation. The bounds, which are often wide in practice, can provide important information about the degree to which causal analyses depend on unverifiable assumptions made by investigators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diemer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: