Introduction/Background A correlation between the morphology of high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas (HGOSC) and BRCA mutations has been previously reported (Soslow RA, Mod Pathol, 2012). Beyond BRCA, we studied the association between the morphology of HGOSC and the presence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Methodology 522 on 806 cases of HGOSC from the PAOLA-1 clinical phase III trial were reviewed, including 163 cases with tumor BRCA mutation (tBRCAm), 345 cases without tumor BRCA mutation (tBRCAwt) and 14 cases with inconclusive BRCA tests. Regarding HRD status, 269 cases (52%) were positive (HRD+), 198 (38%) negative (HRD-) and 55 (10%) inconclusive. Morphological analysis included (i) tumor architecture (more than 25% of solid, endometrioid and transitional patterns defined a SET architecture), (ii) tumor-infiltrating intraepithelial lymphocytes (ieTILs), (iii) tumor stromal lymphocytes (sTILs), (iv) tumor necrosis, and (v) mitotic activity. Results SET architecture (51% vs 40%, p=0.02), high number of ieTILs (16% vs. 8%, p=0.007) and more than 10% of sTILs (27% vs 18%, p=0.02) were associated with tBRCAm compared to tBRCAwt tumors, mostly with tBRCA1m tumors. These criteria were also associated with HRD status, regardless of the tumoral BRCA mutation status: 54% vs 33% (p<0.000001) for SET architecture, 14% vs 6% (p=0.008) for high number of ieTILs and 27% vs 15% (p=0.003) for more than 10% of sTILs, for HRD+ and HRD- tumors respectively. The combination of these three criteria showed high specificity (0.99 (95%CI, 0.97 – 0.99)) but low sensitivity (0.07 (95%CI, 0.04 – 0.10)) to predict HRD+ tumors. Tumor necrosis and mitotic count were not associated with BRCA or HRD statuses. Conclusion If the morphology of HGOSC correlates with HRD status and tBRCA status, it cannot substitute for molecular analysis as validated GIS score in daily practice. Disclosures See COI forms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kime et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: