Other| March 18 2024 Abbreviations and Citations of Friedrich Nietzsche's Works The Journal of Nietzsche Studies (2024) 55 (1): iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.5325/jnietstud.55.1.iv Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Abbreviations and Citations of Friedrich Nietzsche's Works. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 18 March 2024; 55 (1): iv–vi. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/jnietstud.55.1.iv Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressThe Journal of Nietzsche Studies Search Advanced Search The same citation format is used throughout the journal. References to Nietzsche's texts are given in the body of the articles and reviews. References to Nietzsche's unpublished writings are standardized, whenever possible, to refer to the most accessible print editions of Nietzsche's notebooks and publications: Kritische Studienausgabe (KSA), compiled under the general editorship of Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari and based on the complete edition of the Kritische Gesamtausgabe (KGW) (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1967ff) or the electronic version published in the Nietzsche Source collection (http://www.nietzschesource.org/eKGWB) [abbreviated eKGWB]). References to the print editions of letters published by de Gruyter are cited as KSB (Sämtliche Briefe: Kritische Studienausgabe) or KGB (Briefe: Kritische Gesamtausgabe).In references to Nietzsche's works, Roman numerals generally denote the volume number in a set of collected works or standard subdivision within a single work,... You do not currently have access to this content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2024 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: