Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 2024BMJOpen Access

4CPS-198 Evaluation of PROA team intervention acceptance rates through an automated measurement system

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CRCarlos Dı́az RomeroUniversidad de La LagunaCHCamila HerreraCentral University Hospital of AsturiasLLL Oyague LópezCentral University Hospital of Asturias

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Romero et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7692cb6db6435876df22dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-eahp.302
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 14CPS-159 Analysis of the interventions carried out in the geriatric service in collaboration with the internal medicine and microbiology services2024
  2. 25PSQ-036 Analysis of pharmaceutical interventions on antimicrobial prescriptions in the post-operative resuscitation unit2024
  3. 3Five-Year Evaluation of the PROA-NEN Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs at the Hospital and ICU Level of a Clinic in Sincelejo-Sucre2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Self-reported acceptability and feasibility of a multimodal intervention to reduce antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections in primary care: a process evaluation of the RedAres trial among general practitioners and medical practice assistants2025