Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of M3-ProGold files and Pepsi Gold Files.Materials and methods: Eighty files of size 25/.06 of M3 Pro Gold files and Pepsi Gold files (each n = 40) were evaluated for dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance inside two artificial stainless steel canals with 2 different radii [(60 curvature, 3 mm radius) and (60 curvature, 5 mm radius)] at body temperature while submerged in distilled water at 37 ° ± 1 °C. The NCF (number of cycles to failure) was calculated. The data of NCF were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (P ≤ 0 .05). Results: The Pepsi Gold files had a significantly higher number of cycles to failure than the M3 Pro Gold files in both canal radii at body temperature. Conclusion: Pepsi Gold files have greater resistance to cyclic fatigue than M3 Pro Gold files.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
allah et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: