Postmortem tissue and mouse model analysis reveals microglial cellular senescence in progranulin-deficient frontotemporal dementia, highlighting conserved mechanisms of neurodegeneration.
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects patients younger than 65. FTD is characterized by the degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes, leading to progressive behavioral and/or language problems. FTD is a highly heritable neurodegenerative disorder, with 40-50% of patients having a strong family history. Among familial FTD patients, ∼12% carry dominant mutations in the Progranulin (GRN) gene, which result in nonsense-mediated decay in GRN mRNA and haploinsufficiency of the Progranulin (PGRN) protein. Previous studies show that PGRN deficiency causes aberrant age-dependent microglial activation that preferentially affects the thalamocortical circuit of Grn-/- mice. However, how PGRN loss causes cell senescence remains unknown. By performing β-galactosidase activity tests and immunohistochemistry with the Iba1 antibody in the Grn-/- mouse brain and postmortem human brain tissues from patients with GRN mutations, we showed that cellular senescence is a prominent feature that contributes to the expansion of microglia in 4 to 18 month old Grn-/- mouse brains and in patients with GRN mutations. Specifically, microgliosis and increased β-galactosidase activity were detected in the ventral thalamus of Grn-/- mice. Similar microgliosis and cellular senescence phenotypes can be detected in the microglia in the frontal cortex and thalamus of FTLD-GRN carriers. In conclusion, the results support that cell senescence is key and a highly conserved feature in mouse and human microglia with progranulin deficiency. This phenotype most likely contributes to neurodegeneration in Grn-/- mice and in patients with GRN mutations. The research has been done under the guidance and support of Yu-Hsin Huang and Eric J. Huang at the Huang Lab at the University of California, San Francisco.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: