Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study presents seismic response of single degree of freedom (SDOF) elasto-plastic and self-centering systems under far and near-fault ground motions. These parameters was conducted to determine the influence on SDOF structure response in term of ductility, absolute acceleration, absorbed energy, strength ratio and strength reduction factor. It was found that maximum ductility for bilinear elasto-plastic systems was qualitatively similar to self-centering hysteretic systems, by adjusting the value of α and β, a self-centering hysteretic systems could be made qualitatively better than bilinear elasto-plastic systems in term of ductility. With respect to the absorbed energy, the self-centering hysteretic systems always less than comparable bilinear elasto-plastic systems. A three 3-story steel frame Self-Centering Brace Frame (SCBF) was designed according AISC seismic provison to validate of response of single degree of freedom self centering systems. 20 far field earthquake groundmotion are used for analysing of three 3-story steel frame SCBF under DBE (Design Based Earthquake) and MCE (Maximum Considerded Earthquake) level by using computer program PISA3D. The maxmimun value of interstory drift are under 1% and 2%, while residual drift are small.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phạm et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: