The post-auricular muscle in many species’ changes orientation of external ears to improve hearing for biologically relevant sounds. The muscle exists in humans but cannot similarly change direction of their ears. Objectives focused on measuring activity of muscle during speech-in-noise task where orientations of speaker and noise were controlled experimentally to determine how signal-to-noise varies as function of presentation mode and azimuth (target speech and noise co-localized, 45°, or spatially separated, 135° and 45°, respectively). It was hypothesized that activity would be elicited in same proportion of subjects when evoked via earphones compared to speakers; there would be no significant differences in magnitude between conditions; maximum engagement would be observed with speech 135°, noise 45°. Activity was recorded with electrodes affixed around ears, outer canthi and neck, while listeners completed a spatialized listening test (locations of speaker/noise controlled experimentally). There was significant main effect of channel; significant interaction between presentation mode and channel; no significant differences between presentation modes for other muscles; no significant effect of azimuth. Engagement in virtual sound-space suggests that muscle activation occurs consequently of spatially directed attention, even when changes in pinna orientation are unlikely to have effect on sound heard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markotjohn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: