Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 29, 2024Clinical Oral Implants ResearchOpen Access

Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JCJing ChengHZHaidong ZhangHLHailin Liu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76cedb6db6435876e282bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14252
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of four digital methods in capturing complete‐arch implant positions: Direct scanning, splinted scan bodies, three‐dimensional‐printed scan aids, and intraoral photogrammetry2026
  2. 2Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions in Edentulous Jaws: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3The Effects of Different Intraoral Scanners, Scan Levels and Splinting Techniques on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions: An In Vitro Study2026
  4. 4Trueness of Implant Positioning Using Intraoral Scanning and Dental Photogrammetry for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Study2025
  5. 5Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study2024 · 15 citations