The historical marginalization of Indigenous populations in Latin America is exacerbated by environmental degradation, and also by often unjust development initiatives. Against this backdrop, this study conducted a critical analysis of Spanish aid-supported projects, with a focus on identifying the presence (or absence) of essential climate justice indicators. The research methodology entails a comprehensive desk review employing a content analysis of 13 energy projects in Latin America. Our proposed climate justice framework includes four categories: (i) acknowledgment of historical injustices, (ii) inclusion and participation of vulnerable [Indigenous] communities, (iii) capacity-building, and (iv) job creation for Indigenous communities. The findings highlight the lack of transformative nature of the analyzed projects: over half of the projects demonstrated positive outcomes in one category only, with only a single project scoring positively in all four categories. The inclusion and participation of Indigenous groups were observed in less than half of the projects, while most projects provided capacity-building opportunities. This research adds to a critical perspective in examining aid projects by suggesting a decolonial and just transition perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albelda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: