Lexical or statistical information retrieval confronts challenges such as the semantic gap and vocabulary mismatch. In the context of medical data, these difficulties are compounded by users' diverse backgrounds, resulting in disparities in perspective and vocabulary. The intricacies of medical language, including spelling variations, frequent acronyms, and ambiguous concepts, further amplify the semantic gap in medical texts. However, adopting a semantic approach can address these issues, albeit introducing a new challenge in the form of a soft matching nature leading to lower recall. In response, we propose a hybrid information retrieval method that combines semantic and lexical approaches. In contrast to recent experiments with the emphasis on utilizing semantic methods as re-ranker, our current approach diverges by incorporating semantic techniques as a fundamental part of the retrieval model. This shift aims to explore the efficacy of semantic methodologies in the initial retrieval stage rather than exclusively relying on them for post-retrieval refinement. The results obtained from both the semantic and lexical retrieval approaches are subsequently subjected to reranking through Reciprocal Rank Fusion. The proposed method outperforms lexical methods such as BM25L, Jaccard Similarity, and Query Likelihood Model, along with semantic methods, including doc2vec, multilingual BERT, IndoBERT, and MiniLM. It has additionally been demonstrated to be more effective than other hybrid models, PLM-based dense retrieval. This technique has successfully capitalized on the strengths of both semantic and lexical methods, resulting in enhanced overall performance in retrieving relevant documents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maryamah et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: