Since the seminal work of Cundall and Strack (1979), the Discrete Element Method (DEM) has now become accepted as a key tool amongst researchers exploring the fundamental behavior of granular materials. Along with a sustained increase in the number of publications documenting use of DEM in research, intensive development of new open-source and commercial DEM codes has taken place in the last decades. The credibility of these software packages depends on their capacity to replicate physical observations and to reproduce theoretical expressions. Researchers often calibrate DEM codes against laboratory data to gain confidence about their predictions, however, theoretical verifications at the macro and particle levels are often omitted or not explicitly documented or acknowledged. The validation of DEM codes against theoretical expressions is fundamental to guarantee reproducibility and generality of the software, and to avoid bias in more complex simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salomón et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: