Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 27, 2024Journal of Urological SurgeryOpen Access

Circumcision Surgery on YouTubeTM: A Quality Assessment

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ŞCŞeref CoşerİKİbrahim Güven KartalHİHalil İbrahim İvelik

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Quality assessment reveals low reliability and educational value across YouTube circumcision videos, highlighting the need for clinician-led digital health content.

Key Points

  • Circumcision videos on YouTube exhibit poor informational quality and low reliability, with most uploads originating from individual consumers rather than qualified physicians.
  • The mean global quality scale score reached only 2.30 across evaluated circumcision videos, and the corresponding mean modified discern score remained low at 1.71 overall.
  • Highlights the critical need for academic urologists to publish reliable content, as current circumcision videos on public platforms lack rigorous quality assessment standards.

Cite This Study

Coşer et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77698b6db6435876eba6fhttps://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2023.2023-5-4
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of YouTube Videos on Circumcision: Evaluating Reliability and Quality for Patients and Parents2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Anaesthesia Practices in Circumcision Surgery in Children2024
  3. 3An Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Labiaplasty Videos Shared on YouTube2024
  4. 4Educational quality of YouTube videos on breast oncoplasty: A cross-sectional observational study2026
  5. 5SRS59 - Assessment of the quality and reliability of social media videos for patient information on common general surgical procedures2026