Much research has explored how perceptions of speech fluency are influenced by a variety of temporal speech features (e.g. speech rate). However, less is known about the influence of non-temporal and conversational speech characteristics on fluency perceptions. To address this gap, this study explored English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors' perceptions of speech fluency through developing and piloting a rating scale for a paired conversational task for assessment for learning purposes. A two-phase mixed-methods sequential exploratory design (Creswell, 2009) was used. Seven trained EAP instructors watched videos of seven-minute conversations, elicited from 14 intermediate-to-advanced EAP learners. Afterwards, instructors were audio-recorded discussing their observations about learners' fluency. These recordings were transcribed and coded using in-vivo and pattern coding techniques (Saldaña, 2009). Six themes were identified: efficiency, smoothness, sophistication, clarity, facilitating topics and turns, and supporting the conversation partner. These themes informed the development of a multi-item fluency rating scale. 35 EAP instructors then used the scale to rate eight learners' speeches. To investigate the construct-relevance of these scale items, a principal component analysis was conducted, producing two components - individual fluency and conversational fluency. Pedagogical activities aligned with the scale are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kent Williams (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: