Bertrand Russell's epistemology had the interesting structural feature that it made propositional knowledge (“S knows that p ”) asymmetrically dependent upon what Russell called knowledge by acquaintance . On this view, a subject lacking any knowledge by acquaintance would be unable to know that p for any p . This is something that virtually nobody has defended since Russell, and in this paper I initiate a sympathetic reconsideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uriah Kriegel (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: