Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 26, 2024Open Access

An ^115In^+-^172Yb^+ Coulomb crystal clock with 2. 510^-18 systematic uncertainty

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HHH. N. HausserJKJonas KellerTNT. Nordmann

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hausser et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e778e0b6db6435876ede5dhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.16807
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1$^{171}$Yb$^+$ optical clock with $2.2\times 10^{-18}$ systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements2024
  2. 2<sup>171</sup>Yb<sup>+</sup> optical clock with 2.2 × 10<sup>−18</sup> systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Improving lattice-light-shift uncertainty of an 171Yb optical clock with optimized cooling and trapping lasers2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Prospects of a thousand-ion Sn2+ Coulomb-crystal clock with sub-10−19 inaccuracy2024 · 23 citations
  5. 5Intercontinental frequency ratio measurement of <sup>171</sup>Yb and <sup>88</sup>Sr optical lattice clocks2024 · 1 citations