With the high switching speeds of GaN HEMTs, there is an increased risk of dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt induced shoot-through events in bridge configurations. In cases where shoot-through is present, an accurate method to quantify the false turn-ON energy loss is essential to understand the severity of it and GaN HEMT dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt immunity. The capturing and evaluation of a shoot-through event is challenging due to the limited accuracy in instantaneous electrical measurements, and the inaccessibility of the gate node at die level. To address this, first, we revisit the concepts of dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt immunity and its relation to device gate–source and gate–drain parasitic capacitances. We show that the maximum value of the induced v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</inf> spike occurs at a dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt value much lower than the peak dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt value, providing important insights. Then, we propose a simple and robust experimental approach, adapting a no-load circuit, to quantify dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt induced shoot-through energy loss. The technique does not require any high-frequency voltage or current measurements on the device, and it solely relies on average current and voltage measurements external to the device. It is also experimentally demonstrated that e-GaN HEMTs with a monolithically-integrated Miller clamp offer significant shoot-through immunity as opposed to conventional solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: