In On the Trinity 15.12.21, Augustine appears to endorse the KK principle (that if one knows that φ , then one knows that one knows that φ ) in the course of giving an argument – the Multiplicity Argument – against the Academic skeptics. Gareth Matthews has disputed Augustine’s endorsement of the KK principle and presented a different reading of the Multiplicity Argument. In this note, I show that Matthews’s construal of the Multiplicity Argument is both interpretively and technically defective and defend the attribution of some form of the KK principle to Augustine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yale Weiss (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: