This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background The objective of this research was to prepare some Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 @Chitosan (CS) magnetic nanocomposites coupled with nisin, and vancomycin to evaluate their antibacterial efficacy under both in vitro and in vivo against the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. aureus (MRSA). Methods In this survey, the Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were constructed as a core and covered the surface of MNPs via crosslinking CS by glutaraldehyde as a shell, then functionalized with vancomycin and nisin to enhance the inhibitory effects of nanoparticles (NPs). X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques were then used to describe the nanostructures. Results Based on the XRD, and FE-SEM findings, the average size of the modified magnetic nanomaterials were estimated to be around 22–35 nm, and 34–47 nm, respectively. The vancomycin was conjugated in three polymer-drug ratios; 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1, with the percentages of 45.52%, 35.68%, and 24.4%, respectively. The polymer/drug ratio of 1:1 exhibited the slowest release rate of vancomycin from the Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 @CS-VANCO nanocomposites during 24 h, which was selected to examine their antimicrobial effects under in vivo conditions. The nisin was grafted onto the nanocomposites at around 73.2–87.2%. All the compounds resulted in a marked reduction in the bacterial burden (P-value < 0.05). Conclusion The vancomycin-functionalized nanocomposites exhibited to be more efficient in eradicating the bacterial cells both in vitro and in vivo. These findings introduce a novel bacteriocin–metallic nanocomposite that can suppress the normal bacterial function on demand for the treatment of MRSA skin infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasaj et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: